That is part 1 of a multipart group of articles regarding proposed anti-gambling legislation. In this short article I discuss the proposed legislation, what the politicians say it does, some details about the existing state of online gambling, and what the bills really propose.
The legislators are attempting to protect us from something, or are they? The whole lot seems a little confusing to state the least.
The House, and the Senate, are once again considering the problem of “Online Gambling” ;.Bills have been submitted by Congressmen Goodlatte and Leach, and also by Senator Kyl.
The bill being put forward by Rep. Goodlatte gets the stated intention of updating the Wire Act to outlaw all forms of online gambling, to produce it illegal for a gambling business to simply accept credit and electronic transfers, and to force ISPs and Common Carriers to block usage of gambling related sites at the request of law enforcement.
Just as does Rep. Goodlatte, Sen. Kyl, in his bill, Prohibition on Funding of Unlawful Internet Gambling, causes it to be illegal for gambling businesses to simply accept bank cards, electronic transfers, checks and other types of payment, but his bill does not address the keeping of bets.
The bill submitted by Rep. Leach, The Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, is basically a copy of the bill submitted by Sen. Kyl. It centers on preventing gambling businesses from accepting bank cards, electronic transfers, checks, and other payments, and like the Kyl bill makes no changes from what is legal.
According to Rep. Goodlatte “While gambling is illegal in the United States unless regulated by the states, the development of the Internet has made gambling easily accessible. It is common for illegal gambling businesses to use freely until police force finds and stops them.”
In fact, American courts have determined that the Wire Act makes only Sports Betting illegal, and even then only across telephone lines. Hardly any states have laws which make online gambling illegal, some states and Tribes have got steps to legalize online gambling, and even the Federal government recognizes some forms of online gambling to be legal.메이저사이트
Goodlatte himself says his bill “cracks down on illegal gambling by updating the Wire Act to cover all forms of interstate gambling and account for new technologies. Under current federal law, it’s unclear whether using the Internet to use a gambling business is illegal” ;.
Goodlatte’s bill however does not “cover all forms of interstate gambling” as he claims, but instead carves out exemptions for many forms of online gambling such as state lotteries, bets on horse racing, and fantasy sports. Even then, his modifications to the Wire Act do not make online gambling illegal, they allow it to be illegal for a gambling business to simply accept online bets the place where a person risks something of value “upon the results of a contest of others, a sporting event, or even a game predominantly susceptible to chance”, except obviously if it’s a state lottery, horse race, fantasy sports, or one of additional situations.
The truth of the problem is that most online gambling businesses have situated in other countries specifically to avoid the gray area that’s the existing state of online gambling in the US. As a result, there is little that police force can perform to enforce these laws. Trying to make the laws tougher, and providing for stiffer penalties, will not make sure they are more straightforward to enforce.
As well, most, if not all, banks and charge card companies refuse to transfer money to an online gambling business now, as a result of pressure from the federal government. As a result, alternative payment systems sprang as much as fill the void.
Senator Kyl is equally misleading in his statements. From his proposed bill, “Internet gambling is primarily funded through personal usage of payment system instruments, bank cards, and wire transfers.” But even as we know, most bank cards in the U.S. refuse attempts to fund a gambling account.
Also from the Kyl bill, “Internet gambling is an increasing reason behind debt collection problems for insured depository institutions and the consumer credit industry.” If the charge card companies and other financial institutions in the U.S aren’t allowing the funding of gambling, how would it be “an increasing reason behind debt collection problems” ;.And since when do we need legislation for the financial industry to protect itself from high risk debt. If the financial industry was accepting gambling debts and these gambling charges were a problem for them, wouldn’t they just stop accepting them?